By David M. McLain
This blog comes from Colorado firm Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell. Our goal is to use this blog as a means by which to share news and updates regarding construction litigation in Colorado. While we specialize in litigation of complex construction claims, including construction defect matters, we also use this blog as a platform to share thoughts and ideas regarding risk management strategies that can be implemented to minimize the risk of construction related claims.
Thursday, December 13, 2018
Two things to consider before making warranty repairs
In my last article: “What a construction defect ‘win’ looks like for a builder,”
I made the point that builders should go to great lengths to work with
homeowners to resolve legitimate problems through the entire statute of repose,
in order to prevent the homeowners from involving attorneys. Again, happy homeowners do not call attorneys
and do not bring construction defect claims.
In this article, I want to address two ramifications of this strategy
that builders should consider. First,
builders must be aware that any repairs performed will likely start anew the
statutes of limitation and repose for the repairs. Second, builders should inform and involve
their insurers in this process so as to avoid running afoul of their carriers’
“voluntary payments” clauses. In the
long run, keeping homeowners happy is well worth the cost, especially if you
keep in mind these additional considerations.
In
Colorado, an owner has two years after he or she first notices, or should have
noticed, the manifestation of a defect in which to bring a claim, but in no
event can any claim be brought more than six years after substantial completion
unless the defect becomes manifest within years five or six, in which case the
owner gets two more years to bring the claim.
For all intents and purposes, Colorado therefore has a two-year statute
of limitation and a six-plus-two-year statute of repose. Prior to 2010, the repair doctrine equitably
tolled the running of any statute of limitation or repose while the builder
performed repairs or promised to perform repairs. As long as the owner relied on the promises
in not suing, the tolling continued until the builder finished the repairs or
stopped promising such repairs. The
Colorado Supreme Court did away with the repair doctrine in 2010 when it issued
its decision in Smith v. Executive Custom Homes.
Today,
there is no tolling if the builder merely promises, but does not perform
repairs. If an owner sends a notice of
claim pursuant to C.R.S. § 13-20-803.5, and the builder actually performs
repairs in response, the statutes of limitation and repose will be tolled until
sixty days after the completion of the notice of claim process, including the
repairs. Whether the owner goes through
the formal notice of claim process, or simply sends a warranty request, and the
builder performs repairs, the owner may be able to successfully argue that the
statutes of limitation and repose are reset as to the repairs themselves by
bringing a claim for negligent repair.
An
additional consideration to have in mind is the effect of making repairs on
your insurance coverage. Especially in
situations where the cost of repair is substantial, builders should consider
involving their insurance companies in the discussion and process so that any
money spent on performing the repairs may be treated, if the repair is
ultimately unsuccessful, as satisfying, either totally or partially, the
deductible or self-insured retention. If
the carrier is not on board with the repairs beforehand, and a claim is filed
afterward, carriers will likely argue that the money spent was done without
their knowledge and consent and, therefore, paid voluntarily by the
builder. Voluntary payments do not
satisfy deductibles or self-insured retentions.
Nothing
contained in this article is intended to scare builders from spending the money
necessary to keep homeowners happy. To
the contrary, that advice still applies.
Builders should know, however, that the repairs performed may restart
the statutes of limitation and repose for those repairs. Also, unless you want to get stuck holding
the bag for more expensive repairs, involve your carriers early in the process
and endeavor to get their agreement that any moneys spent to keep homeowners
happy, if ultimately unsuccessful, can be treated as satisfying your deductible
or self-insured retention. Now go forth
and keep the plaintiffs’ attorneys at bay.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Disclaimer
The information contained in this blog is provided for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and should not be construed as providing legal advice on any subject matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment