The analysis by the Weitz court is exactly what Judge Du found unpersuasive as it failed to dissect the plain language of the clause, instead relying on the history of the clause within the insurance industry. While the Jaynes case is not authority in Colorado, the fact is a trend is emerging in courts of neighboring jurisdictions and soon Colorado courts may be faced with a similar analysis. We have to wait and see if Weitz will be challenged soon. Using these mounting cases as support for an extension of coverage under the “ongoing operations” clause seems imminent in Colorado courts.
For additional information regarding Colorado construction litigation, please contact David M. McLain at (303) 987-9813 or by e-mail at email@example.com.