The bill also seeks to
change many existing commercial practices between contractors, subcontractors,
and suppliers. It is presently unclear whether the bill allows parties to
contract around these payment procedure provisions, or whether these
requirements are simply “gap filling” provisions that pertain if there are no
written contract terms specified on these issues. The proposed statute would mandate payment to
subcontractors and material suppliers due within seven days in the absence of a
dispute about the work or materials being billed. After this seven day period,
the bill would require the payment of interest at the rate of 1.5% monthly (18%
annually). In any later suit for
payment, the creditor would also be able to collect reasonable attorneys’
fees. Additionally, non-payment to a
subcontractor or supplier who is later found to be entitled to prompt payment would
excuse the subcontractor or supplier, and its surety bond provider, from any
further performance under the contract.
It is presently unclear
whether the bill allows parties to contract around these payment procedure
provisions. However, it is clear that the bill provides some leeway for change
orders, as long as there is (1) negotiation in good faith between the parties
concerning the changed scope of work, and (2) a 50% payment of a
subcontractor’s costs by the changing party within 30 days of the change order
work being done. Additionally, the bill provides for retainage, but in an
amount of no more than 5%.
For additional information regarding Colorado construction litigation, please contact David M. McLain at (303) 987-9813 or by e-mail at mclain@hhmrlaw.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment